Recent Results

This is a plot of 30 runs for the 4mm cube, poisson dist from 1 to 25um. The variation occurs in the later stages once failure has already set in. 1.528 GPa

2619035[].hhpc-hn1
Bypass inclusion on
4mm/Atest.uda.0032-->62

...

2619260.hhpc-hn1
4mm/Atest.uda.063
4mm with 3 grid
Inclusion calculation off
B4C.xml
dk2:13e12
eta:6e-12
poisson, 1-25^2.6

2619695.hhpc-hn1
4mm/Atest.uda.065
4mm with 3 grid
B4C.xml
dk2:6e-5
eta:832000
poisson, 1-25^2.6
1.45GPa
takes about 15 minutes irl


 Turned out that $RANDOM doesn't work in tcsh, use bash instead.
cat >
cat >>

2619704.hhpc-hn1
4mm/Atest.uda.067
testing the built B4C.xml
1.48GPa!!

Testing the built addric.pbs
2619706.hhpc-hn1
4mm/Atest.uda.068
 1.48GPa- this one isnt right.

2619765.hhpc-hn1

Lets try a new setup that allows us to retain input decks so we know the random seed. We will use jobno as the .xml input into the .ups file.  Lets try it out.

2619765.hhpc-hn1- should make a new $PBS_JOBID.ups and .xml files and run off them...
4mm/Atest.uda.069
1.58GPa

2619766[].hhpc-hn1
4mm/Atest.uda.070-30?
eta=13e12*4e-3^3=832000
-1.5137e+09 GPa
stdev:1.1212e+08
30 runs
lets get more runs on this after we get data for .125mm



2619769[].hhpc-hn1
1mm/Atest.uda.000-99?
Running into a problem with simultaneous calls to sus I think.
Only got to 72 runs.

eta=(13e12*1e-3^3)=13000
-1.4877e+09
9.2777e+07


2619770[].hhpc-hn1
p125mm/Atest.uda.003-102?
did not work, trying again.


eta=13e12*.125e-3^3=25.39

2619843.hhpc-hn1
p125mm/Atest.uda.103
Dropped 25um max to 5um...is it possible the flaw size is too big for the cell size??

This is behavior we get at .p125 mm with 1um to 25um flaw size:

Why does stress critically increase??